Tuesday, November 29, 2011


ProfTom's Top 10 List

Form the Portland Business Journal  and Oregon Business
Top 100 places to work (HR attributes)

1. Human Capital Metrics (page 162, Drive/Pink)
a) Firms, 20 to 500 FTE's (ROI of HR Functions matters)
2. Core/Key employees (college, experienced, talented)
b) Path most PSU SBA stumble upon or follow
3. Career Path
c) Connections to strengths and social pathways
4. Career Planning
d) You must plan/design it before it plans your disappointments  
5. Global HR
e) Major trend in HR
6. Free Agent
f) Dan Pinks other major contribution to career planning
7. Generalist
g) Is more secure than specialist, think super flexible generalist
8. HRIS
h) Major HR competency
9. Social Media Resume Ripple Effect
I) Social media impacts on the old standard, googlization
10. Organizational  Management and Change  
  J) Cultivating competitive business environments  

Saturday, November 19, 2011


Individual Top 10 Resource List/links
Based on our individual top ten list we made in class.    
  1. Compensation and Pay  
  2. Career Development
  3. EAP
  4. HRIS
  5. Civil Rights Laws
  6. Occupational Health and Safety
  7. Unions
  8. Training and Development
  9. Staffing
  10.  SHRM

David Ulrich is one of the most influential American HR Scholars

Next class we will construct a group "top ten list." The list will focus on developing a HR/Management reading list. 

Tuesday, November 15, 2011


Unionization and Labor Relations

Social Movements (group actions)
Industrialization to urbanization
Civl Rights, Equal Rights, Workers Rights

Why do workers join unions?
Dissatisfaction with management (5 examples)
Job Security (when did concept start?) (what is it like now?)
The social nature of groups (collectives, individualistic)

How and Why does unionization impact our culture (figure 12.5 p. 344)   

Steps to start a union (page 329)

Collective bargaining process (page 332)

Monday, November 7, 2011


Talent Development

  1. What are the top resources for HR professionals?
    1. SHRM tracking HR Trends
    2. SHRM PDX Chapter
    3. HRCI or Professional Development
    4. PSU HR Degree
    5. ASTD
    6. ASTD PDX
    7. CEBS
    8. DOL
    9. OHSA


  1. The Gartner Croup sustainable talent presentation
  2. What Would Dan Pink say about "How Much is a lot"
  3. Why do you think you came up with that number?

Tuesday, November 1, 2011


The Wrong Inequality

We live in a polarizing society, so perhaps it’s inevitable that our experience of inequality should be polarized, too.
In the first place, there is what you might call Blue Inequality. This is the kind experienced in New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Dallas, Houston and the District of Columbia. In these places, you see the top 1 percent of earners zooming upward, amassing more income and wealth. The economists Jon Bakija, Adam Cole and Bradley Heim have done the most authoritative research on who these top 1 percenters are.
Roughly 31 percent started or manage nonfinancial businesses. About 16 percent are doctors, 14 percent are in finance, 8 percent are lawyers, 5 percent are engineers and about 2 percent are in sports, entertainment or the media.
If you live in or around these big cities, you see stores and entire neighborhoods catering to the top 1 percent. You see a shift in social norms. Up until 1970 or so, a chief executive would have been embarrassed to take home more than $20 million. But now there is no shame, and top compensation zooms upward.
You also see the superstar effect that economists have noticed in the income data. Within each profession, the top performers are now paid much better than the merely good or average performers.
If you live in these big cities, you see people similar to yourself, who may have gone to the same college, who are earning much more while benefiting from low tax rates, wielding disproportionate political power, gaining in prestige and contributing seemingly little to the social good. That is the experience of Blue Inequality.
Then there is what you might call Red Inequality. This is the kind experienced in Scranton, Des Moines, Naperville, Macon, Fresno, and almost everywhere else. In these places, the crucial inequality is not between the top 1 percent and the bottom 99 percent. It’s between those with a college degree and those without. Over the past several decades, the economic benefits of education have steadily risen. In 1979, the average college graduate made 38 percent more than the average high school graduate, according to the Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke. Now the average college graduate makes more than 75 percent more.
Moreover, college graduates have become good at passing down advantages to their children. If you are born with parents who are college graduates, your odds of getting through college are excellent. If you are born to high school grads, your odds are terrible.
In fact, the income differentials understate the chasm between college and high school grads. In the 1970s, high school and college grads had very similar family structures. Today, college grads are much more likely to get married, they are much less likely to get divorced and they are much, much less likely to have a child out of wedlock.
Today, college grads are much less likely to smoke than high school grads, they are less likely to be obese, they are more likely to be active in their communities, they have much more social trust, they speak many more words to their children at home.
Some research suggests that college grads have much bigger friendship networks than high school grads. The social divide is even starker than the income divide.
These two forms of inequality exist in modern America. They are related but different. Over the past few months, attention has shifted almost exclusively to Blue Inequality.
That’s because the protesters and media people who cover them tend to live in or near the big cities, where the top 1 percent is so evident. That’s because the liberal arts majors like to express their disdain for the shallow business and finance majors who make all the money. That’s because it is easier to talk about the inequality of stock options than it is to talk about inequalities of family structure, child rearing patterns and educational attainment. That’s because many people are wedded to the notion that our problems are caused by an oppressive privileged class that perpetually keeps its boot stomped on the neck of the common man.
But the fact is that Red Inequality is much more important. The zooming wealth of the top 1 percent is a problem, but it’s not nearly as big a problem as the tens of millions of Americans who have dropped out of high school or college. It’s not nearly as big a problem as the 40 percent of children who are born out of wedlock. It’s not nearly as big a problem as the nation’s stagnant human capital, its stagnant social mobility and the disorganized social fabric for the bottom 50 percent.
If your ultimate goal is to reduce inequality, then you should be furious at the doctors, bankers and C.E.O.’s. If your goal is to expand opportunity, then you have a much bigger and different agenda.

Sunday, October 30, 2011


Our Unpaid, Extra Shadow Work

CAMBRIDGE, Mass (Interesting Read, connects to this weeks topic) 
THE other night at the supermarket I saw a partner at a downtown law firm working as a grocery checker, scanning bar codes. I’m sure she earns at least $300,000 per year. Even so, she was scanning and bagging her purchases in the self-service checkout line. For those with small orders, this might save time spent waiting in slower lines. Nonetheless, she was performing the unskilled, entry-level jobs of supermarket checker and bagger free of charge.
This is “shadow work,” a term coined 30 years ago by the Austrian philosopher and social critic Ivan Illich, in his 1981 book of that title. For Dr. Illich, shadow work was all the unpaid labor — including, for example, housework — done in a wage-based economy.
In a subsistence economy, work directly answers the needs of life: gathering food, growing crops, building shelters and fires. But once money comes into play, a whole range of tasks arises that do not address basic needs. Instead, such work may enable one to earn money and buy both necessities and, if possible, luxuries.
To do the work requires extra jobs, like commuting. The commuter often has to own, insure, maintain and fuel a car — and drive it — just to get to work and back. These unpaid activities ancillary to earning one’s wages are examples of shadow work.
In the industrialized world, few of us live in a subsistence mode, so shadow work is ubiquitous: shopping, paying bills, housework. Digital technology — with its spam, e-mail, texting, smartphones and so on — is steadily ramping up the burden of shadow work for all whose lives revolve around its magnetic field.
Science fiction novels of a half-century ago dramatized conflicts between humans and robots, asking if people were controlling their technologies, or if the machines were actually in charge. A few decades later, with the digital revolution in juggernaut mode, the verdict is in. The robots have won. Although the automatons were supposedly going to free people by taking on life’s menial, repetitive tasks, frequently, technological innovation actually offloads such jobs onto human beings.
The conventional wisdom is that America has become a “service economy,” but actually, in many sectors, “service” is disappearing. There was a time when a gas station attendant would routinely fill your tank and even check your oil and clean your windshield and rear window without charge, then settle your bill. Today, all those jobs have been transferred to the customer: we pump our own gas, squeegee our own windshield, and pay our own bill by swiping a credit card. Where customers once received service from the service station, they now provide “self-service” — a synonym for “no service.” Technology enables this sleight of hand, which lets gas stations cut their payrolls, having co-opted their patrons into doing these jobs without pay.
Examples abound, helping drive unemployment rates. Airports now have self-service check-in kiosks that allow travelers to perform the jobs of ticket agents. Travel agents once unearthed, perused and compared fares, deals and hotel rates. Shadow-working travelers now do all of this themselves on their computer screens. Medical patients are now better informed than ever — as a result of hours of online shadow work. In 1998, the Internal Revenue Service estimated that taxpayers spent six billion hours per year on “tax compliance activities.” That’s serious shadow work, the equivalent of three million full-time jobs.
Once upon a time, retail stores had employees who were not cashiers but roamed the floor, assisting customers. Go into a Wal-Mart or Target or Staples and find someone to help you locate and choose a product. Good luck. You’re on your own, left to wander the aisles in search of an unoccupied staff person. (Meanwhile, you might stumble on and purchase some item you hadn’t planned on buying.) Here, it’s not technology, but a business tactic that cuts payroll expenses by trimming the service provided to customers — and prolongs the time those customers spend rambling around inside the store. Regardless, the result is still more shadow work, as customers take on the job that retail salespeople once did.
Shadow work isn’t always unpaid; sometimes it shows up at one’s salaried job in the form of new tasks covertly added to one’s responsibilities. Not long ago, human resources departments kept track of employees’ vacation, personal and sick days. In many organizations, employees now enter their own data into absence management software.
One nostalgic appeal of the “Mad Men” television series is the way it evokes memories of certain amusingly dated aspects of business life, like “support staff,” and even “secretaries.” Support staff is becoming a quaint, antiquarian concept, a historical curiosity like typewriters, stenography and executive washrooms. We all have our own computers, of course, and we type and print our own letters, copy our own reports and mail our own missives. Even those in senior management perform these humdrum jobs.
Of course, these shadow chores never appear in one’s job description, let alone justify any salary increase. Shadow work is just covertly added to our daily duties. As robotic devices replace human workers, end-users like customers and employees are taking on the remnant of the transaction that still requires wetware — a brain. New waves of technology change how things are done, and we docilely adapt — unavoidably so, as there’s usually no alternative. Running a business without e-mail is hardly a viable option, but with e-mail comes spam to be evaluated and deleted — more shadow work.
TO be sure, shadow work has its benefits. Bagging one’s own groceries or pumping one’s own gas can save time. Shadow work can increase autonomy and enlarge our repertoire of skills and knowledge. Research on the “Ikea effect,” named for the Swedish furniture manufacturer whose products often require home assembly, indicates that customers value a product more highly when they play a role in constructing it.
Still, doctors routinely observe that one of the most common complaints today is fatigue; a 2007 study pegged its prevalence in the American work force at 38 percent. This should not be surprising. Much of this fatigue may result from the steady, surreptitious accumulation of shadow work in modern life. People are simply doing a huge number of tasks that were once done for them by others.
Doing things for one another is, in fact, an essential characteristic of a human community. Various mundane jobs were once spread around among us, and performing such small services for one another was even an aspect of civility. Those days are over. The robots are in charge now, pushing a thousand routine tasks onto each of our backs.
Craig Lambert is the deputy editor of Harvard Magazine.

Monday, October 17, 2011


Lecture Notes
Week # 4

Class Objectives
1.     Workforce obtainment phase #3 Selection (#1 HRP, #2 Recruitment)
2.     Selection Process
3.     Training and Development
4.     Career Planning and Development

The Perfect match between organizational KSA Demand and workforce KSA supply depends the organizations selection process and the worker Career Development abilities. 

Problem

Business Savvy, Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, Great Communicating people rule the business world.  But, once you find them how do you select them?

My question becomes how do we select these types of people. (US Workforce) EPI

Guess what? The selection process often takes too long and gets too complicated.

Example

1.     Application Tracking System (post-it notes, spreadsheets, HRIS)
2.     Preliminary Screening (matching of KSA’s)
3.     Review of Applications (Data, information, standardize decision making criteria)
4.     Resume Review (tracking, developmental scan, does it make sense)
5.     Applicant Testing (basic functions, critical skills, assessment centers)
6.     Interviewing (content interview, unstructured/structured/Behavioral/one-on-one/group/panel/multiple/sress/realistic)
7.     Question and process design (pages 156-157)
8.     Pre-Employment Screening and Background check (public records, ireference)
9.    Selection decision  

On-boarding

·      Orientation (operational, cultural)
·      Administrative (documentation, compliance information, security) 
·      Direct Benefits review (health, dental, life, retirement, formal packages)   
·      Indirect Benefits review (FAB of working here)


Training and Development

·      Learning Organization

·      Training and Development Process (7.1, page 177) Determine organization and individual training needs

Key Term exercise (page 192, groups of 2, write key term on card, word definition, example of question)

Career Planning and Development

Key Term exercise (page 206, groups of 2, write key term on card, word definition, example of question)